Chủ Nhật, 26 tháng 6, 2011

hairstyle 2011 long

images hairstyles 2011 long straight. hairstyle 2011 long. hair hairstyles 2011 women
  • hair hairstyles 2011 women


  • NikNikon
    October 23rd, 2005, 09:30 AM
    Sounds good to me. QJ?? Anyone else?

    Speaking of QJ I haven't seen much activity from her lately, you still out there Queen?




    wallpaper hair hairstyles 2011 women hairstyle 2011 long. 2011 Long Hairstyles
  • 2011 Long Hairstyles


  • wandmaker
    04-28 08:50 AM
    what if they are both used in the same sentence for the same case like they did for OP ? :)

    My best guess is :D

    pre-adjudicated under review = it is not over yet :)




    hairstyle 2011 long. long hairstyles 2011 women.
  • long hairstyles 2011 women.


  • coopheal
    03-13 10:12 AM
    Thanks. It is employer decision.
    I know of cases where, H1b was not cancelled.
    Can you please give link to USCIS site stating the rule ?

    ALL: Please share your experience in this area.

    I know from my company lawyers that if employee leaves the company they have to inform USCIS about the leaving by requesting to cancel the H1B.

    I am not sure why you company would like you to move from H1B to EAD?




    2011 2011 Long Hairstyles hairstyle 2011 long. long hair styles 2011. long
  • long hair styles 2011. long


  • sumansk
    07-12 02:08 PM
    :D who knows those guests are guests of 'SPIES'..no offense to anyone ....If you are not , please register...:D



    more...

    hairstyle 2011 long. sleek long hairstyle 2011
  • sleek long hairstyle 2011


  • Munna Bhai
    01-08 01:56 PM
    Hello,

    My brother-in-law and sister are both Indian Doctors, having a private practice in INDIA. They would like to apply for visitor's visa.

    Any suggestion about the problems they may encounter? Do they have to go on two differrent dates for getting the visa stampped at Chennai?

    Thanks in Advance,




    hairstyle 2011 long. hairstyles 2011 long layered.
  • hairstyles 2011 long layered.


  • gaz
    02-04 01:11 AM
    I just got the H1 Approval for 1 year and 2 months (1 year H1 Extension and 2 months recapture time). I am currently in Malaysia and need to apply for a visa at US Consulate in Malaysia. Since I am on the H1 visa, I have to show the proof that I will return back to Malaysia after the end of my work period in US. Accordingly, I would need to purchase the round trip ticket. The issue is that the plane ticket only valid for the maximum of 1 year, but my visa valid for 1 year and 2 months. Please advise if one way plane ticket would be sufficient for the visa interview or need to be a round trip plane ticket. If it is not, what should I do? Also, I wonder if the application package including I-129 submitted to USCIS need to be stamped �Certified True Copy� with the original signature of the lawyer or employer for the visa interview. Can I use the copy one that is stamped �Certified True Copy� with the non-original signatures of my lawyer or employer? Anybody pls help. Thank you very much.

    I'm not an attorney - so please treat this as my opinion, and not a definitive statement of fact. Based on my personal experience in India, the one year ticket should be fine - you can always postpone the date of the ticket whenever needed (some airlines charge a fee for it). The proof of return is more like an intent to return.

    As for the I129 - my lawyer added no such stamps or certification.

    Please do check with your lawyer also. Also, try calling the US consulate.

    Good luck.



    more...

    hairstyle 2011 long. hairstyles 2011 long hair
  • hairstyles 2011 long hair


  • gcformeornot
    10-12 02:25 PM
    you need to get paid all the time. Even during maternity leave. Not getting paid is voilation of status and violation of employer-employee relationship.




    2010 long hairstyles 2011 women. hairstyle 2011 long. hairstyles 2011 long straight.
  • hairstyles 2011 long straight.


  • sertasheep
    07-01 06:23 PM
    I don't think there's a way one can display the names of the people who participated in this poll.



    more...

    hairstyle 2011 long. 2011 hairstyles 2011 long with
  • 2011 hairstyles 2011 long with


  • chanduv23
    07-05 04:25 PM
    This has been discussed, we can't help.

    It takes time for people to come on same page.

    Lot of lawyers have conference calls with their clients - discuss what "their clients" must do.

    One good thing is a lot of our members under the IV umbrella have the zeal to do something. Looking at the Munnabhai threads etc...

    It is a matter of time before we get organized. IV core is working hard on various aspects.

    Before anyone does anything under the IV umbrella - please contact sertasheep or pappu or macaca.




    hair long hair styles 2011. long hairstyle 2011 long. 2011 long haircuts 2011
  • 2011 long haircuts 2011


  • samrat_bhargava_vihari
    06-26 02:26 PM
    For sure it wont' happen. There is no practical way to implement it. So stop worrying about all these hypothetical issues.

    Don't get into these kind of loop, unfortunately now a days people are unnecessary giving importance to these kind of rumors than daily activities.



    more...

    hairstyle 2011 long. wallpaper long wavy hairstyle
  • wallpaper long wavy hairstyle


  • shortchanged
    08-27 07:59 PM
    [QUOTE=Lisap;155340
    This afternoon I received receipts from the original filing with a receipt date of July 2nd. [/QUOTE]

    If you stopped payment on individual checks (My banks charges $30 for each check stoppage) it would have been denied eventhough USCIS tried to cash it (instantly as it is electronic transaction).That you received receipt notices means, the checks went through, and your application is considered properly filed.
    If stopped as a batch of checks (it is free of charge with my bank), it would still go through, despite your stoppage request, as it is like paper check.
    So to be absolutely certain, you should stop them individually if you want to stop payment on the 2nd set of application too.

    Looks like you are indeed very lucky to have got things in order despite your attorney's best efforts to screw up!

    I am in some what similar situation;my checks are seen today as encashed on 8/23 for a July 2 filing.I too send out a 2nd set of I-485 applications on 8/16, as I got scared of missing out on the window of opportunity.I have asked today for stop payment on all my checks individually for this 8/16 filing.




    hot sleek long hairstyle 2011 hairstyle 2011 long. dresses Long Wavy Hairstyles
  • dresses Long Wavy Hairstyles


  • sammyb
    02-09 10:31 PM
    RNGC .. great work done by your little princes ... am eagerly waiting to see the letter ... guess when you post in the forum you have an option to attach certain documents like pdf etc ...

    Sammy.



    more...

    house hairstyles 2011, hairstyle 2011 long. long hairstyles for women 2011
  • long hairstyles for women 2011


  • Googler
    02-14 04:24 PM
    "Based on a review of the facts and bedrock principles of administrative agency law, the Court finds that USCIS�s name check requirement has
    (1) never been authorized by Congress;
    (2) is not mentioned or contemplated by any fair reading of the current USCIS regulations; and
    (3) may not, without USCIS initiating notice and comment procedures, be used to delay action on Plaintiffs petitions..."

    http://www.bibdaily.com/pdfs/Mocanu%202-8-08.pdf

    What a fabulous ruling this is.

    One question for Lazycis:

    # (3) actually reads "(3) may not, without USCIS initiating notice and comment procedures, be used to delay action on Plaintiffs petitions for naturalization, particularly because Plaintiffs have already undergone a name check in order to achieve LPR status and will clear the �fingerprint check� described in the Memorandum of January 25, 2008.10 The fingerprint check will show whether an LPR who is applying for naturalization has had any contact with the criminal justice system that would warrant denial of the petition."

    As far as I can tell even (1) and (2) only apply to Naturalization applicants.

    So the question of the hour is: are (1) and (2) true for AOS cases? I am asking this question because to argue a case for compelling recapture you need an AOS version of Baylson's ruling + the Galvez-Howerton decision (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=223315&postcount=121). Only then can you say that there was affirmative misconduct in 2003 and hence compel recapture.




    tattoo hairstyles 2011 long layered. hairstyle 2011 long. Long Curly Hairstyles 2011
  • Long Curly Hairstyles 2011


  • greyhair
    09-30 05:12 PM
    I cracked up reading the post. I never really understood why they call us losers and locusts.

    Google translation maybe funny but i think the meaning of the post on Chinese forum is serious. When we giving money to IV which is working for everyone in the backlog, Chinese are only thinking for themselves. Scratch the, Chinese are not thinking for even themselves, they are cutting the same branch of the tree on which they are sitting. They are undermining the effort to address the green card backlog. They are trying to use fuzzy match to argue against removal of per country limits in the the process shooting themselves on the foot. If I understand their logic correctly, these Chinese are saying that we are ok if they have to wait in the backlog for years and years, as long as Indian don't get any benefit. That's just plain dumb for them to think like this.

    The other day someone posted that Chinese are calling Charles Oppenheim at DOS, asking him to not advance the dates of Indians, and rather only advance the dates of Chinese, which apparently backfired.

    I have many good friends from China and they are all very nice. But as a group why do we always see Chinese digging hole everywhere?



    more...

    pictures hairstyles 2011 long hair hairstyle 2011 long. emo hairstyle 2011 long black
  • emo hairstyle 2011 long black


  • WaitingYaar
    01-18 08:54 PM
    which category?




    dresses dresses Long Wavy Hairstyles hairstyle 2011 long. 2011 Hairstyles For Long Hair
  • 2011 Hairstyles For Long Hair


  • nissan_1
    10-26 11:28 AM
    Now I am confused with the PD of labor...

    Here is the scenario -

    Labor - Approved
    PD - April 2007
    I140 Pending
    6th year H1B expiring on march 2008.

    Assuming I140 will not be apprved by March 2008, can we get 1 year Extension?



    more...

    makeup 2011 hairstyles 2011 long with hairstyle 2011 long. hairstyles 2011,
  • hairstyles 2011,


  • piyush77
    03-24 07:54 PM
    I am having similar problem, I have my I-140 approved in 2007 485 filed in july 2007. I got laid off, now I want to change job with project manager title. is it safe to do that but my core technical knowledge will be same as before in the job description.




    girlfriend Long Curly Hairstyles 2011 hairstyle 2011 long. hairstyles 2011 women long.
  • hairstyles 2011 women long.


  • immigrationmatters30
    01-16 08:23 AM
    Nothing in this bill talks about the increasing EB VISA numbers but they have clause for the family based VISA numbers to about 1Million.I know Mr.Obama would bring "change" but it is not going to be good for us. Anytime he talked about legal immigration, he only made references to family based immigration backlogs. Never have I heard him talk about EB VISA backlogs.I think we are in for a change which not going be so good after all.




    hairstyles wallpaper long wavy hairstyle hairstyle 2011 long. hairstyles 2011 long curly.
  • hairstyles 2011 long curly.


  • sweet_jungle
    09-16 01:59 AM
    I am a July 2 filer. I got 485 receipt notice from California Service Center with receipt date of july 2. Today, in mail, I got another notice called transfer notice, which states that my case has been transferred to Nebraska. The receipt date on the transfer notice is Sep 5. Is it nromal to have such diferent receipt dates? Will USCIS process by receipt date on receipt notice or on transfer notice?




    tanu_75
    07-29 02:53 PM
    The calculations have a huge margin or error there because it is based on 2 wrongs. USCIS data is not fully accurate and tracker data is small. 2 wrongs do not make a right. It is better to trust information directly from people talking to Department of State and USCIS. Lawyers know better as they do this everyday for many years.

    Interesting so you're willing to acccept information from your lawyer who you think gets his information from USCIS but not willing to trust USCIS's information which we use here that USCIS makes itself available freely now. Hmm, not saying don't trust your lawyer but you would be surprised how inefficient some of the lawyers can be. None of them predicted the movement for the past two months which was pretty much spot on based on analysis by Q and others on the thread. I would rather trust analysis which I can see and test myself rather than take the word of a lawyer just because he's a lawyer.




    ashutrip
    06-18 09:38 AM
    Yeah, Atlanta is hatching eggs with our PERM applications.
    whats ur PD mine is march 10 2007



    Không có nhận xét nào:

    Đăng nhận xét